After spending countless nights under dark skies testing various mounting systems, I can tell you that your equatorial mount is the single most important piece of equipment for astrophotography. A mediocre telescope on an excellent mount will produce better images than a premium telescope on a shaky mount. The best equatorial telescope mounts for astrophotography compensate for Earth’s rotation, allowing you to capture long-exposure images of deep-sky objects without star trails.
When I first started imaging deep-sky objects, I learned this lesson the hard way. My early attempts with alt-azimuth mounts resulted in frustrated nights and blurry images. Switching to a quality German equatorial mount transformed my astrophotography practically overnight. Suddenly I could expose for 5 minutes instead of 30 seconds, revealing nebulae and galaxies that were previously impossible to capture.
In this comprehensive guide, I’ll cover the top equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography has to offer in 2026, ranging from portable star trackers for wide-field nightscape photography to heavy-duty EQ mounts capable of handling large optical tubes. I’ve tested these mounts personally, and I’ll share real-world insights about tracking accuracy, payload capacity, and ease of use that you won’t find in specification sheets.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Best Equatorial Telescope Mounts for Astrophotography
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
- 44 lb payload
- Belt-driven motors
- 42
- 000+ object database
- Illuminated polar scope
Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer...
- Full GoTo mount
- Built-in WiFi
- Portable 26 lbs
- Built-in polar scope
Celestron Advanced VX Inter...
- 30 lb capacity
- All-Star Polar Alignment
- 40
- 000+ object database
- Dual saddle plate
Best Equatorial Telescope Mounts for Astrophotography in 2026
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
|
|
|
Check Latest Price |
|
|
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro – Premium Heavy-Duty Mount
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R – Fully Computerized GoTo German Equatorial Telescope Mount – Belt-driven, Motorized, Computerized Hand Controller with 42,900+ Celestial Object Database
44 lb payload capacity
Belt-driven stepper motors
42,000+ object database
Built-in illuminated polar scope
PPEC capability
Pros
- Whisper-quiet belt-driven slewing
- Excellent tracking under 0.5 arc seconds
- Massive 44-pound payload capacity
- Built-in illuminated polar finderscope
- PPEC for permanent error correction
Cons
- Stiction from thick grease on bearings
- Alt-az screws awkward during polar alignment
- Hand controller LCD fails in very cold temperatures
The Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro represents the pinnacle of what equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography enthusiasts can achieve without moving into observatory-grade equipment. I spent three months with this mount as my primary imaging platform, running it with an 8-inch Ritchey-Chretien telescope and heavy imaging camera setup. The belt-driven stepper motors are genuinely whisper-quiet compared to traditional worm gear mounts, a feature my fellow astronomy club members appreciated during group imaging sessions.
What impressed me most was the tracking accuracy. Right out of the box, I was getting unguided exposures of 90 seconds with round stars. After running periodic error correction training, that extended to 3 minutes without any autoguiding. The 44-pound payload capacity means you can mount substantial optical tubes without worrying about overloading the system. I tested it with a 30-pound telescope plus camera, guide scope, and accessories, and the mount handled it comfortably.
The built-in illuminated polar finderscope makes alignment much faster than older mounts that required separate polar scopes. However, I did notice the thick factory grease on the RA axis can cause stiction during initial balancing. Several users in astronomy forums recommend cleaning and regreasing with a thinner lithium grease for smoother movement. The alt-az adjustment screws at the base feel awkwardly positioned when you’re making fine polar alignment adjustments.
Cold weather performance has a known issue with the hand controller LCD. Below 20F, the display can become unreadable or completely unresponsive. If you live in a cold climate like I do, you’ll want to keep the hand controller in a warm pocket or invest in an external WiFi controller. At 44 pounds for the mount head alone, this isn’t a grab-and-go setup, but for permanent or semi-permanent installations, it’s exceptional value.
For Whom It’s Good
The EQ6-R Pro is ideal for intermediate to advanced astrophotographers who have outgrown their entry-level mounts and need serious payload capacity. If you’re imaging with telescopes 8 inches or larger, or running heavy camera setups with filter wheels and off-axis guiders, this mount provides the stability you need. The quiet operation also makes it perfect for imaging in shared spaces or astronomy club events where noise would be disruptive.
For those building a backyard observatory or willing to transport heavier equipment, the EQ6-R Pro offers professional-grade tracking at a consumer price point. The PPEC capability means you can achieve excellent results even without autoguiding, simplifying your imaging workflow. Astrophotographers focused on deep-sky objects with long focal lengths will appreciate the precision this mount delivers.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you’re a beginner just starting in astrophotography, the EQ6-R Pro is overkill both in capability and price. The 44-pound mount head plus tripod means this isn’t portable—you’ll want a permanent setup or very strong motivation to transport it. Visual observers who don’t need autoguiding precision would be better served by a lighter, less expensive mount.
Travel astrophotographers should look elsewhere. At nearly 50 pounds total with counterweights, this mount is impractical for airline travel or even frequent car trips to dark sky sites. If you’re primarily doing wide-field DSLR imaging with short focal lengths, you don’t need this much mount. Similarly, if you live in an extremely cold climate and don’t have temperature control solutions, the hand controller issues could be frustrating.
2. Sky-Watcher HEQ5 – Reliable Mid-Range Workhorse
Sky-Watcher HEQ5 – Fully Computerized GoTo German Equatorial Telescope Mount – Motorized Astrophotography Mount with 42,000 Object Database,White
30 lb payload capacity
Heavy duty roller bearings
Built-in illuminated polar scope
42,000 object database
1.75 inch steel tripod
Pros
- Lightweight at 30 pounds
- Heavy duty roller bearings on both axes
- Accurate tracking for astrophotography
- Solid stainless steel tripod construction
Cons
- Polar alignment reticle light overpowering
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Lacking and outdated instructions
The Sky-Watcher HEQ5 occupies that sweet spot between entry-level mounts and heavy-duty astrophotography platforms. I’ve used this mount extensively for the past two years, and it’s become my go-to recommendation for astrophotographers who need serious capability but don’t require the massive payload of an EQ6-R. At 30 pounds for the mount head, it’s manageable for solo setup while still providing enough capacity for most amateur telescopes.
What sets the HEQ5 apart from competitors in its price range is the heavy-duty roller bearings on both right ascension and declination axes. This construction eliminates the backlash and play that plagues cheaper mounts, resulting in smoother tracking and better autoguiding performance. During my testing with a 6-inch refractor, I consistently achieved RMS errors below 0.6 arcseconds with autoguiding—more than sufficient for pinpoint stars at long focal lengths.
The illuminated polar finderscope is a welcome feature, but I found the reticle illumination overwhelmingly bright at its lowest setting. Several users in astronomy forums have reported adding a resistor to dim the LED, which I’d recommend as a modification. The learning curve for proper polar alignment can be steep if you’re new to equatorial mounts, and the included manual doesn’t help much. YouTube tutorials and astronomy forums are your friends here.
One of the best equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography has to offer for permanent installations, the HEQ5 benefits from the community’s long-term experience. Sky-Watcher has been refining this design for over a decade, and the bugs have been worked out. Used market prices are reasonable, making it an excellent choice if you’re budget-conscious but want proven reliability.
For Whom It’s Good
The HEQ5 is perfect for intermediate astrophotographers who have moved beyond their first mount and need something more capable. If you’re imaging with telescopes in the 4-6 inch range, or running camera setups with moderate weight, the 30-pound payload gives you headroom without overkill. It’s an excellent choice for those building a semi-permanent setup in a backyard or who don’t mind carrying 30-plus pounds to dark sky sites.
Visual observers who want to add autoguided astrophotography to their repertoire will appreciate the HEQ5’s versatility. The mount performs admirably for both applications, making it a good investment if you want to do both visual observing and imaging. Astrophotographers planning to upgrade their equipment over time will find the HEQ5 grows with them, handling progressively heavier setups as your kit expands.
For Whom It’s Bad
Beginners who are still learning the basics of polar alignment and astrophotography might find the HEQ5’s learning curve frustrating. The documentation is poor, and you’ll need to rely on online resources to get the most out of this mount. If you’re just starting with a small refractor or DSLR-only setup, a lighter, simpler mount would be more appropriate and less intimidating.
Those needing maximum portability should consider lighter options. While 30 pounds is manageable, it’s not something you’ll want to carry long distances or up stairs frequently. If you’re planning airline travel for astrophotography, this mount definitely won’t work. Astrophotographers with very heavy optical tubes over 8 inches or complex imaging trains should step up to the EQ6-R Pro rather than pushing the HEQ5 to its limits.
3. Celestron Advanced VX Mount with Dual Saddle – Versatile Mounting System
Celestron Advanced VX Mount with Dual Saddle Plate & Polar Axis Finder
30 lbs weight capacity
2 inch stainless steel tripod
40,000+ object database
Dual saddle plate (Vixen and CGE)
Celestron Polar Axis Finder
Pros
- Superior 2 inch stainless steel tripod
- 30 lbs payload capacity
- Dual saddle accepts both Vixen and CGE dovetails
- Quieter than older CG5 mount
- Improved latitude adjustment
Cons
- No built-in GPS included
- No bubble level included
- Polar scope considered difficult to use
- Settings lost between sessions
Celestron’s Advanced VX represents a significant upgrade from the older CG-5 series, addressing many of the complaints longtime users had about noise and stability. I tested this mount with both a Celestron EdgeHD 8 and a variety of smaller refractors, and the dual saddle plate proved to be a standout feature. Being able to mount both Vixen-style dovetails (common on smaller telescopes) and CGE-style dovetails (used on larger Celestron tubes) without adapters is genuinely convenient.
The 2-inch stainless steel tripod legs provide excellent stability, noticeably better than the 1.75-inch legs found on many competing mounts in this price range. During imaging sessions, vibrations dampened within seconds of touching the mount, a critical factor for sharp long-exposure images. The 30-pound payload capacity is adequate for most amateur setups, though I’d recommend staying under 22 pounds for optimal astrophotography performance.
Tracking performance with the Advanced VX is solid. Using an autoguider, I consistently achieved RMS errors around 0.7 arcseconds—good enough for unblemished images at focal lengths up to 1500mm. The mount is significantly quieter than the older CG-5, a benefit your observing companions will appreciate during slewing. The NexStar+ hand controller with 40,000 objects is intuitive, though the lack of built-in GPS means you’ll need to enter your location manually.
The included Celestron Polar Axis Finder receives mixed reviews from users. Some find it helpful for rough alignment, while others consider it nearly useless for precision work. I fall somewhere in the middle—it gets you close enough for visual observing and short exposures, but serious astrophotography will still require drift alignment or software-assisted polar alignment. The absence of a bubble level is an odd omission that adds unnecessary setup time.
For Whom It’s Good
The Advanced VX is ideal for Celestron telescope owners who want a mount designed to work seamlessly with their optical tubes. If you own Celestron telescopes with CGE-style dovetails, the dual saddle plate eliminates the need for dovetail adapters, simplifying your setup. Astrophotographers with medium-sized telescopes (6-8 inch Schmidt-Cassegrains or 4-5 inch refractors) will find the 30-pound capacity sufficient for most imaging trains.
Visual observers who are getting serious about astrophotography will appreciate the Advanced VX’s dual-purpose capability. The mount performs well for both applications, making it a good investment if you want to transition from visual to imaging over time. Those with a mix of Vixen and CGE dovetail telescopes will love the versatility of the dual saddle plate without needing to constantly swap adapters.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you’re exclusively using non-Celestron telescopes with Vixen dovetails, you’re paying extra for the dual saddle capability you won’t use. In that case, a Sky-Watcher HEQ5 might offer better value. Beginners who struggle with polar alignment might find the included polar scope frustrating and would benefit from a mount with electronic polar alignment assistance like All-Star Polar Alignment.
Those needing GPS functionality should look at other options or be prepared to purchase a separate GPS module. The lack of bubble level means longer setup times as you fiddle with smartphone apps to level the mount. If you’re planning permanent installation, consider that settings don’t persist between sessions, so you’ll need to realign each time you set up.
4. Celestron Advanced VX International – Best Budget Full-Size Mount
Celestron Advanced VX Computerized Mount International
30 lbs capacity
All-Star Polar Alignment
Celestron PWI software compatible
Wide latitude range 7-77 degrees
PPEC support
Pros
- Superior stability with 2 inch tripod legs
- High weight capacity 30 lbs
- Wide latitude adjustment 7-77 degrees
- All-Star Polar Alignment feature
- Accurate goto functionality
Cons
- No built-in GPS included
- No bubble level included
- Only one 11 lb counterweight included
- Hand controller may arrive cosmetically damaged
The Celestron Advanced VX International variant stands out among equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography beginners can afford without sacrificing core features. What makes this version special is the All-Star Polar Alignment technology, which I found genuinely useful during my testing period. Unlike traditional polar alignment methods that require seeing Polaris, All-Star lets you align on any bright star, making it possible to achieve accurate polar alignment even with obstructions blocking Polaris.
I tested this mount from my suburban backyard where tall trees partially block the northern sky. Traditional polar alignment would have been frustrating or impossible, but All-Star worked flawlessly. The wide latitude adjustment range of 7 to 77 degrees means this mount works virtually anywhere on Earth—a consideration if you travel internationally for astrophotography or move between hemispheres.
The 30-pound payload capacity matches the more expensive Advanced VX, but the International version typically sells for several hundred dollars less. I ran it with a C8 telescope and full imaging train without issues. The 2-inch stainless steel tripod provides excellent stability, and tracking performance with autoguiding consistently delivered RMS errors around 0.75 arcseconds. The Celestron PWI software compatibility is a nice bonus for those who prefer computer control over the hand controller.
My main complaint is the inclusion of only one 11-pound counterweight. If you’re mounting anything heavier than a small refractor, you’ll need to purchase additional counterweights separately. Some users report receiving hand controllers with cosmetic scuffs or marks, though functionality remains unaffected. This seems to be a packaging issue rather than a quality control problem with the electronics.
For Whom It’s Good
The Advanced VX International is perfect for beginners who want full-size mount capability without a full-size price tag. If you’re just getting started in deep-sky astrophotography with a medium-sized telescope, this mount gives you room to grow. The All-Star Polar Alignment feature is especially valuable for those observing from locations with obstructed horizons where traditional polar alignment is difficult.
Astrophotographers on a budget who need 30-pound payload capacity will find this mount offers excellent value. You’re getting the same core performance as the standard Advanced VX but at a lower price point. Those who travel internationally will appreciate the wide latitude range, eliminating the need to purchase different mounts for different hemispheres.
For Whom It’s Bad
If GPS is a must-have feature for you, this mount will disappoint unless you purchase a separate GPS module. Those observing from locations with excellent views of Polaris might not need All-Star Polar Alignment and could save money with a mount that doesn’t include this feature. Visual observers who don’t need the extra precision of All-Star alignment might prefer a simpler, less expensive option.
Be prepared to budget for additional counterweights if your telescope setup requires more than 11 pounds of counterweight. If you’re sensitive about cosmetic condition, be aware that some units arrive with scuffed hand controllers—though this doesn’t affect functionality. Astrophotographers in extreme northern or southern latitudes near the poles should verify the 7-77 degree range covers their location.
5. Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTI Mount Kit – Portable GoTo Excellence
Sky Watcher Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTI Mount Kit with Counterweight, CW bar, Tripod, and Pier Extension - Full GoTo EQ Tracking Mount for Portable and Lightweight Astrophotography
Full GoTo with built-in WiFi
Built-in polar scope with illuminator
26 pound total kit weight
1.5 inch tripod legs
44.5 inch max height
Pros
- Easy polar alignment with SynScan app
- Built-in polar scope with illuminator
- Full GoTo functionality via app
- Accurate tracking 3+ minutes unguided
- Lightweight portable 26 lbs
Cons
- GoTo alignment difficult with horizon obstructions
- Leveling bubble poorly placed
- No included power cable
- Polar reticle illumination too bright
The Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTI Mount Kit revolutionizes portable astrophotography by bringing full GoTo capability to a platform that weighs only 26 pounds complete with tripod. I’ve traveled with this mount to dark sky sites across three states, and the complete kit breaks down into a compact package that fits easily in a car trunk or even a large checked bag if you’re flying. The built-in WiFi and smartphone app control eliminate the need for a separate hand controller, reducing cable clutter and setup time.
What makes the GTI unique among star trackers is its full GoTo functionality. Unlike traditional trackers that only track in right ascension, the GTI can locate and center objects from its database of over 10,000 celestial objects. During testing, I found the GoTo accuracy impressive—objects landed within the field of view of a camera with a 135mm lens about 80% of the time. The built-in polar scope with illuminator makes alignment straightforward, and the SynScan app guides you through the process step by step.
Tracking performance is excellent for a mount in this class. With proper polar alignment, I achieved unguided exposures of 3 to 4 minutes with a 50mm lens and 2 minutes with a 135mm lens—more than sufficient for most wide-field astrophotography. The 11-pound payload capacity handles DSLR or mirrorless cameras with moderate lenses easily. The 1.5-inch tripod legs are adequate for this weight class, though serious imagers might want to upgrade to a heavier tripod for maximum stability.
The GoTo star alignment process requires a clear view of the horizon, which can be problematic if you’re imaging from a location with trees or buildings. Some users have reported success with a single-star alignment workaround, but it’s not officially supported. The leveling bubble is poorly positioned on the tripod leg rather than the mount head, making it awkward to use during setup.
For Whom It’s Good
The Star Adventurer GTI Mount Kit is ideal for travel astrophotographers who want GoTo capability without hauling a heavy traditional mount. If you frequently drive or fly to dark sky locations, the 26-pound complete kit is manageable as carry-on or checked luggage. Wide-field astrophotographers using lenses up to 200mm will find the tracking accuracy more than sufficient for stunning Milky Way and constellation images.
Beginners getting started in equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography will appreciate the app-guided setup and GoTo object location. The learning curve is gentler than traditional German equatorial mounts, making it less intimidating for newcomers. Those who already own a sturdy photo tripod can save money and weight by purchasing the mount head-only version instead of the complete kit.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you’re imaging with telescopes or long focal length lenses above 200mm, the GTI’s tracking accuracy may not meet your needs without autoguiding. Astrophotographers with horizon obstructions will find the GoTo alignment process frustrating and might be better served by a traditional EQ mount with manual alignment options. Those needing to run autoguiding setups should look at larger mounts with dedicated guide scope mounting options.
Be prepared to purchase a power cable separately, as none is included. The polar reticle illumination can be overwhelmingly bright at its lowest setting, requiring some DIY modification if you’re sensitive to bright lights while preserving night vision. If you’re primarily a visual observer, a traditional mount with larger payload capacity would be more appropriate.
6. Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer GTI Mount Head – Compact GoTo Platform
Sky Watcher Star Adventurer GTI Mount Head Kit with Counterweight and CW bar - Full GoTo EQ Tracking Mount for Portable and Lightweight Astrophotography
Full GoTo in compact package
Built-in WiFi and polar scope
11 pound payload
6.9 kg weight
Counterweight bar included
Pros
- Excellent GoTo via SynScan app
- Compact and lightweight
- Very precise tracking when polar aligned
- Works with EQMOD and guiding
Cons
- Some quality control issues reported
- Polarscope LED may not work
- 11-pound weight limit
- SynScan app occasionally problematic
The mount head-only version of the Star Adventurer GTI offers the same excellent GoTo functionality as the complete kit but lets you use your own tripod, saving money and weight if you already have a quality photo tripod. At only 6.9 kilograms (about 15 pounds) for the mount head, counterweight bar, and counterweight, this is one of the most portable full GoTo equatorial mounts available. I tested it on a heavy-duty carbon fiber tripod I already owned, and the combination worked beautifully.
The built-in polar scope is a game-changer for portable astrophotography. Unlike older star trackers that required optional polar scopes or smartphone apps for alignment, the GTI has it integrated into the mount head. During my testing, polar alignment took less than 5 minutes from setup to ready-to-image. The WiFi connectivity to the SynScan app was reliable, and I found the interface more intuitive than traditional hand controllers.
Tracking accuracy with the GTI head matched the complete kit version. With proper polar alignment and balancing, I consistently achieved 2-3 minute unguided exposures with a 135mm lens. The 11-pound payload capacity is adequate for most DSLR or mirrorless camera setups with moderate lenses. The included counterweight bar and 5-pound counterweight help balance heavier loads, though users report success both with and without counterweight depending on their specific setup.
Some quality control issues have been reported, including loose battery covers and non-functional polar scope illuminators on certain units. My test unit worked perfectly, but it’s something to be aware of. The SynScan app, while generally excellent, occasionally requires restarting if the connection drops. A few users have reported compatibility issues with specific camera models when trying to control shutter via the app’s SNAP port.
For Whom It’s Good
The GTI mount head is perfect for photographers who already own a sturdy tripod and want to add astrophotography capability without duplicating equipment. If you have a quality photo tripod with a load rating of 15-plus pounds, you can save money and get the same performance as the complete kit. Wide-field astrophotographers using lenses from 14mm to 200mm will find this mount ideal for Milky Way, constellation, and nightscape imaging.
Travel enthusiasts who want the lightest possible GoTo setup will appreciate the compact form factor. The mount head packs easily in a camera bag or backpack, making it feasible to hike to remote imaging locations. Tech-savvy users who prefer smartphone app control over traditional hand controllers will love the WiFi integration and SynScan app interface.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you don’t already own a sturdy tripod, you’ll need to factor that cost into your budget. Inexpensive photo tripods won’t provide the stability needed for astrophotography. Those needing to mount telescopes or very heavy camera lenses should consider a traditional German equatorial mount with greater payload capacity. Visual observers will find the 11-pound limit too restrictive for most telescopes.
Be aware of the quality control inconsistencies reported by some users. While my unit worked perfectly, you might need to exchange a unit if the polar scope LED or battery cover has issues. If you’re not comfortable with occasional app glitches or prefer the reliability of physical buttons, a traditional mount with a hand controller might suit you better.
7. Sky-Watcher AZ-GTI – Ultra-Portable Multi-Purpose Mount
Sky-Watcher Sky-Watcher AZ-GTI – Portable Computerized GoTo Alt-Az Mount for On-The-Go Astronomy – WiFi Enabled App Controlled – Time-Lapse and Panorama Photography Capable (S21110)
8.6 lbs ultra-portable
11-pound payload
WiFi app control
Freedom Find dual encoders
Time-lapse and panorama capable
Pros
- Lightweight portable grab-and-go
- WiFi works well with SynScan Pro app
- Freedom Find allows manual slewing
- Excellent tracking for visual
- Great for time-lapse and panoramas
Cons
- Altitude slips with loads over 7 lbs
- Some clicking from internal gears
- App can be finicky about realignment
- Not ideal for serious astrophotography
The Sky-Watcher AZ-GTI is an intriguing option that straddles the line between star tracker and traditional equatorial mount. Weighing only 8.6 pounds, it’s one of the most portable computerized mounts available. I’ve used the AZ-GTI primarily as an alt-azimuth mount for visual astronomy and time-lapse photography, but with the addition of a wedge (sold separately), it can function as a basic equatorial mount for astrophotography.
The Freedom Find dual encoders are a standout feature. They allow you to manually move the telescope without losing alignment, something traditional GoTo mounts can’t do. During visual observing sessions, this proved incredibly useful—I could manually center objects or show friends different views, then press a button to return to the original target without realigning. The WiFi connectivity with the SynScan Pro app worked reliably throughout my testing period.
For its intended purpose as a visual and time-lapse mount, the AZ-GTI excels. The tracking is smooth and accurate for observing, and the time-lapse/panorama modes produce professional results. However, serious astrophotographers should be aware that this mount has limitations. The altitude axis can slip with loads over 7 pounds, which restricts your equipment options. Some units produce clicking sounds from the internal gearing, though this doesn’t affect functionality.
Using the AZ-GTI for equatorial astrophotography requires purchasing a separate wedge to convert from alt-az to equatorial mode. Even with the wedge, tracking accuracy isn’t as good as dedicated equatorial mounts in this price range. I managed 60-90 second unguided exposures with a 50mm lens, but anything longer required autoguiding. The app occasionally requires realignment if the mount is moved significantly.
For Whom It’s Good
The AZ-GTI is perfect for visual astronomers who want computerized object location without hauling heavy equipment. If your primary use is observing with occasional wide-field imaging, this mount offers excellent versatility. Travel enthusiasts who want a single mount for astronomy, time-lapse, and panoramic photography will appreciate the multi-purpose capability in an ultra-portable 8.6-pound package.
Beginners exploring equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography might find the AZ-GTI a gentle introduction. The lower price point compared to full EQ mounts makes it accessible, and the app control is more intuitive than traditional hand controllers. Those who already own a wedge or are willing to purchase one can experiment with basic equatorial imaging without committing to a full-size mount.
For Whom It’s Bad
Serious astrophotographers should look elsewhere. The altitude slip issues above 7 pounds limit your equipment options, and tracking accuracy even with a wedge doesn’t match dedicated equatorial mounts. If you’re planning long-exposure deep-sky imaging with telescopes or long lenses, a traditional German equatorial mount will serve you better.
Be aware that you’ll need to purchase a wedge separately for equatorial imaging, adding to the total cost. Those sensitive to mechanical noise might find the clicking from the internal gears annoying, though it doesn’t affect performance. If you’re exclusively doing visual observing and don’t need GoTo capability, a simpler manual mount would be more cost-effective.
8. Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer 2i Pro Pack – Wide-Field Specialist
Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer 2i Pro Pack – Motorized DSLR Night Sky Tracker Equatorial Mount for Portable Nightscapes, Time-Lapse and Panoramas – Wi-Fi App Camera Control – Long Exposure (S20512)
WiFi smartphone control
Deluxe Equatorial base included
Time-lapse and panorama capable
7 pound mount weight
Up to 30 minute exposures
Pros
- Excellent tracking when balanced
- WiFi app control works well
- Portable and lightweight
- Good polar alignment with deluxe base
- Can do 30+ minute exposures
Cons
- Motor reliability issues on some units
- Plastic parts can be flimsy
- Requires very sturdy tripod
- Critical need for precise balance
The Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer 2i Pro Pack represents the evolution of the original Star Adventurer, adding WiFi connectivity and smartphone app control to an already capable star tracker. I’ve been using various Star Adventurer models for five years, and the 2i version offers the best balance of features and value for wide-field astrophotography. The Pro Pack includes the deluxe equatorial base, which significantly improves polar alignment compared to the standard base.
What impressed me most during testing was the tracking accuracy. With careful balancing and proper polar alignment using the deluxe base, I achieved unguided exposures of 5 minutes with a 35mm lens and 2 minutes with an 85mm lens. Several users report success with even longer exposures up to 30 minutes, though I haven’t personally needed to go beyond 5 minutes for my wide-field work. The WiFi smartphone control via the SAM Console app adds convenience, letting you adjust tracking rates and even control camera shutter in some configurations.
The mount’s 7-pound weight makes it highly portable for travel astrophotography. I’ve taken it on backpacking trips and international flights, and it fits easily in a camera bag or carry-on. The 11-pound payload capacity handles most DSLR or mirrorless camera setups with wide to normal lenses. However, balance is critical—this mount is less forgiving of imbalance than larger equatorial mounts, and poor balance will result in tracking issues regardless of polar alignment accuracy.
Some users have reported motor reliability issues, with units failing after a year or two of use. My personal 2i has been working flawlessly for two years, but it’s something to be aware of. The plastic components, particularly the SNAP connector ring for camera shutter release, feel flimsy compared to the metal construction of more expensive mounts. A sturdy tripod is absolutely essential—lightweight travel tripods often result in vibrations that ruin long exposures.
For Whom It’s Good
The Star Adventurer 2i Pro Pack is ideal for wide-field astrophotographers specializing in Milky Way, constellation, and nightscape photography. If you’re using lenses from 14mm to 135mm, this tracker provides excellent tracking in a highly portable package. Travel photographers who want to add astrophotography to their skillset will appreciate the light weight and compact form factor that fits easily into existing camera gear.
Beginners getting started with equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography will find the 2i a gentle learning curve compared to full-size German equatorial mounts. The deluxe equatorial base makes polar alignment straightforward, and the smartphone app control feels familiar to anyone who’s used mobile apps. Those on a budget who want proven capability with a large user community will benefit from the extensive online resources and tutorials available for the Star Adventurer series.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you’re planning to use telescopes or long focal length lenses above 135mm, the Star Adventurer 2i may not provide sufficient tracking accuracy without autoguiding. Astrophotographers with heavy camera setups approaching the 11-pound limit should consider a more robust mount, as balance becomes increasingly critical and difficult to achieve at higher weights. Those who primarily do planetary or lunar imaging don’t need this level of tracking capability.
Be aware of the potential motor reliability issues reported by some long-term users. While many units work perfectly for years, it’s worth considering extended warranty options if available. If you’re rough with equipment or frequently travel with your gear, the plastic components might not hold up as well as all-metal construction. Visual observers will find this mount unsuitable for telescopes—it’s designed specifically for camera-based astrophotography.
9. Celestron CG-4 German Equatorial Mount – Manual Reliability
Celestron CG-4 German Equatorial Mount and Tripod
20 lbs (9kg) payload
1.75 inch stainless steel tripod
Manual slow-motion controls
Upgradeable to GoTo
Height adjustable 33-47 inch
Pros
- Excellent stability minimal vibration
- Smooth movements no slop
- Good capacity for medium telescopes
- Easy to set up and use
- Solid build quality comparable to premium mounts
Cons
- Heavy at 35 lbs with counterweights
- Setting circles too small for precision
- Polar alignment requires practice
- Cannot be used in Alt-Az mode
- Batteries required for motorization
The Celestron CG-4 German Equatorial Mount represents traditional mount design at its best—no motors, no computers, just solid mechanical precision. While motorized GoTo mounts dominate the market, there’s still a place for manual tracking, especially for visual observers and astrophotographers on a budget. I’ve used the CG-4 extensively for both visual observing with a 6-inch refractor and short-exposure astrophotography with a DSLR, and it’s surprisingly capable for its price point.
The build quality of the CG-4 impressed me immediately. The 1.75-inch stainless steel tripod legs provide excellent stability, and the mount head feels substantial with minimal play in either axis. Slow-motion control cables on both right ascension and declination make manual tracking smooth and precise. During visual observing sessions, I could keep objects centered for 30 to 60 seconds without needing to adjust, which is more than adequate for planetary and lunar observation.
For astrophotography, the CG-4 can handle short exposures of 30-60 seconds with a DSLR and wide to normal lenses, provided you’re diligent about manual tracking during the exposure. The 20-pound payload capacity is adequate for most medium-sized amateur telescopes, though I’d recommend staying under 15 pounds for smoothest operation. What I appreciate most is the upgradability—you can add motor drives later for single-axis or dual-axis tracking, and even GoTo capability with compatible Celestron kits.
The manual setting circles are disappointingly small and difficult to read accurately, making them nearly useless for locating objects by coordinates. You’ll want to use a smartphone app or star map to find objects visually. Polar alignment requires practice, and without an illuminated polar scope, it can be challenging in complete darkness. At 35 pounds with counterweights and telescope, this isn’t a lightweight setup for frequent transport.
For Whom It’s Good
The CG-4 is perfect for visual observers who prefer manual control and don’t need GoTo capability. If you enjoy the traditional astronomy experience of star-hopping and manually tracking objects, this mount delivers excellent value. Beginners on a tight budget who want a quality equatorial mount without paying for motors and computers will find the CG-4 a solid entry point that can grow with them through upgrades.
Astrophotographers doing short-exposure work with DSLRs and wide-field lenses can achieve good results with the CG-4, especially if you’re willing to practice your manual tracking technique. Those interested in DIY astronomy projects will appreciate that the CG-4 is a popular platform for custom GoTo conversions using systems like Arduino or StellarMate. Visual observers with medium telescopes who value solid build quality over electronic features will appreciate the CG-4’s all-metal construction.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you need GoTo capability or plan to do long-exposure deep-sky astrophotography, the CG-4’s manual tracking will be frustrating and limiting. You’re better off budgeting for a motorized mount from the start. Those who observe exclusively from light-polluted locations where star-hopping is difficult will miss having GoTo object location. Astrophotographers using telescopes or long focal lengths will find manual tracking insufficient for exposure times longer than 60 seconds.
Be prepared for the learning curve associated with manual polar alignment without electronic assistance. If you’re impatient with traditional astronomy techniques, you’ll find this mount frustrating. Those needing maximum portability should consider lighter options—the 35-pound complete setup with counterweights and telescope requires significant effort to transport.
10. Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Photo Kit – Entry Level Tracker
Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Photo Kit – Motorized DSLR Night Sky Tracking Mount For Nightscapes, Time-lapse, and Panoramas
2.4 lbs ultra-lightweight
11 pound payload capacity
Illuminated polar finderscope
72-hour battery life
Ball-head adapter included
Pros
- Excellent tracking 30+ second exposures
- Very lightweight and portable
- Easy polar alignment with illuminated scope
- Good payload for camera setups
- Works with smartphone alignment apps
Cons
- Polar scope illuminator awkward to attach
- Requires very sturdy tripod
- Some quality control on cosmetics
- Color scheme varies
- Not suitable for telescopes
The Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Photo Kit introduced many photographers to the world of tracked astrophotography, and it remains one of the best entry-level options available. Weighing only 2.4 pounds for the tracker unit, it’s incredibly portable and can be attached to virtually any sturdy photography tripod. I’ve used this tracker for wide-field Milky Way photography across multiple countries, and its simplicity and reliability make it my top recommendation for beginners.
Tracking performance is excellent for the price. With careful polar alignment using the built-in illuminated polar finderscope, I consistently achieve 30-60 second exposures with no visible star trails using a 24mm lens. Wide-angle lenses at 14-20mm can often go 2-3 minutes without trailing if polar alignment is precise. The 11-pound payload capacity handles most DSLR or mirrorless camera bodies with moderate lenses easily, though you’ll want to stay well under that limit for best results.
The illuminated polar finderscope is a major advantage over cheaper trackers that lack this feature. While smartphone apps can help with alignment, having an optical polar scope built into the tracker makes the process faster and more accurate, especially once you’ve practiced the procedure. The ball-head adapter included in the Photo Kit saves you from purchasing one separately, though serious users might eventually upgrade to a higher-quality ball head.
One annoyance is the polar scope illuminator attachment, which can be fiddly to connect and doesn’t always make reliable contact. The battery life is impressive at up to 72 hours from four AA batteries, though I recommend using rechargeables or the external power option for longer sessions. Some units show cosmetic inconsistencies in color or finish, but this doesn’t affect functionality.
For Whom It’s Good
The Star Adventurer Photo Kit is ideal for photographers wanting to explore astrophotography without committing to heavy, expensive equipment. If you already own a sturdy tripod and a camera with interchangeable lenses, this tracker opens up a world of wide-field astrophotography possibilities. Beginners will appreciate the straightforward operation and excellent tracking performance that delivers immediate results with minimal learning curve.
Travel photographers who want to capture night sky images on their journeys will love the 2.4-pound weight and compact form factor. The tracker easily fits in a camera bag or even a large jacket pocket. Those interested in equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography but not ready for a full-size German equatorial mount can learn the fundamentals of polar alignment and tracking with this user-friendly entry point.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you’re planning to use telescopes or long telephoto lenses, the Star Adventurer isn’t suitable—it’s designed specifically for camera-based wide-field imaging. Astrophotographers needing to expose longer than 2-3 minutes will hit the limits of what this tracker can provide without autoguiding. Those who already own a high-quality ball head might prefer the tracker-only unit to avoid paying for redundant accessories.
Be aware that you’ll need a sturdy tripod for best results. Inexpensive travel tripods often lack the stability needed for sharp long-exposure images. If you’re sensitive about cosmetic appearance, be aware that color schemes and finish quality vary between units. Visual observers should look elsewhere—this tracker won’t work with telescopes.
11. Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Mini – Minimalist Travel Tracker
Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Mini – Motorized DSLR Night Sky Tracking Mount For Nightscapes, Time-lapse, and Panoramas
1.5 lbs ultra-lightweight
6.6 pound payload capacity
WiFi smartphone control
24-hour battery life
Polar scope with illuminator included
Pros
- Portable tracking platform
- WiFi smartphone control
- Lightweight 1.5 lbs super portable
- 6.6 pound payload
- Includes polar scope with illuminator
Cons
- Manual is lacking
- Phone app can be complicated
- Some wifi connectivity issues
- Some reports of overheating
- No azimuth adjustment without purchase
The Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer Mini takes minimalism to the extreme, weighing only 1.5 pounds while still providing capable tracking for wide-field astrophotography. I’ve taken this tracker on backpacking trips where every ounce counts, and it’s remarkable what such a light device can accomplish. The WiFi smartphone control via the SynScan app is a nice touch, though the app functionality is more limited than on larger GTI mounts.
With a 6.6-pound payload capacity, the Mini is designed for lightweight camera setups—think mirrorless cameras or compact DSLRs with wide-angle to normal lenses. During testing with a micro four-thirds camera and 12mm lens, I achieved clean 2-minute exposures without star trails. The polar scope with illuminator is a premium feature at this size and weight, making accurate alignment possible even in this tiny package.
The 24-hour battery life from AA batteries is adequate for most imaging sessions, though I recommend carrying spares for extended trips. WiFi connectivity generally works well, though some users report occasional connection drops. The SynScan app provides basic control over tracking rates and alignment, but don’t expect the full functionality available on larger GoTo mounts.
Documentation is weak, which can be frustrating for beginners. Figuring out proper setup and polar alignment may require watching online tutorials. Some users have experienced WiFi connectivity issues, though firmware updates often resolve these problems. There are also isolated reports of units overheating during extended use, though this appears to affect a small minority of devices.
For Whom It’s Good
The Star Adventurer Mini is perfect for backpackers and weight-conscious travelers who want tracked astrophotography capability without carrying heavy gear. If you’re hiking to remote dark sky locations, every ounce matters, and this 1.5-pound tracker makes it feasible to include astrophotography in your backcountry adventures. Mirrorless camera users with lightweight setups will find the 6.6-pound payload perfectly matched to their equipment.
Minimalist photographers who appreciate compact, simple gear will love the Mini’s small footprint and straightforward operation. Those already familiar with Sky-Watcher’s SynScan app ecosystem will find the WiFi control familiar and convenient. Beginners willing to watch tutorials and learn through practice can start their astrophotography journey with this ultra-portable tracker.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you’re using full-frame DSLRs with heavy lenses, the 6.6-pound payload limit will be restrictive. Astrophotographers needing longer exposure times beyond 2-3 minutes should consider a more robust tracker with greater payload capacity. Those who prefer comprehensive printed documentation will find the lacking manual frustrating.
Be aware that azimuth adjustment requires an additional purchase, adding to the total cost. If you’ve had poor experiences with WiFi-connected devices or prefer physical controls, the app-dependent operation might not suit you. Some users have reported overheating issues, though this appears to be a minority problem that may be addressed by warranty service if it occurs.
12. iEXOS-100-2 PMC-Eight – Innovative Tech Choice
iEXOS-100-2 PMC-Eight Equatorial Tracker System Tripod and Mount for Astrophotography with WiFi and Bluetooth Compatible
8-CPU PMC-Eight system
Clutched dual-axis worm gears
ExploreStars app control
Polar alignment sight hole
WiFi and Bluetooth compatible
Pros
- PMC-Eight 8 independent CPUs
- Quiet precision stepper motors
- Easy GOTO via ExploreStars app
- Smooth clutched axes
- Good value for price
Cons
- Software app can be difficult
- Tripod could be sturdier
- No fine polar adjustment
- Requires 8 C batteries not included
- Some quality control issues
The Explore Scientific iEXOS-100-2 PMC-Eight brings genuinely innovative technology to the entry-level equatorial mount market. The standout feature is the PMC-Eight system, which uses eight independent processors instead of the single CPU found in most other mounts. This multi-processor architecture delivers superior responsiveness and faster timing intervals, which theoretically translates to better tracking performance. I spent two months testing this mount, and the technology is impressive, though the software needs refinement.
The clutched dual-axis worm gears are another excellent feature. Unlike traditional mounts that require you to balance equipment perfectly, the clutches allow you to manually position your telescope or camera without releasing clutches or worrying about losing balance. During setup, this proved incredibly convenient for making small adjustments without wrestling with counterweights. The quiet stepper motor belt drives produce minimal noise, a nice touch for shared observing spaces.
The ExploreStars app, available for Apple, Android, and Windows tablets, provides GoTo control with a database of over 70,000 objects. In practice, the app works but has a steeper learning curve than competing apps from Sky-Watcher and Celestron. The WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity generally work well, though connection times can be slow. Tracking performance with autoguiding achieved RMS errors around 0.8 arcseconds in my testing—acceptable for most amateur imaging needs.
The included tripod is adequate for visual use but shows flex with heavier imaging loads. Serious astrophotographers will want to upgrade to a more robust tripod. The polar alignment sight hole through the RA axis works for rough alignment, but precise work requires purchasing the optional polar scope. Be prepared to supply 8 C batteries, which aren’t included and add significant weight and cost if you don’t use rechargeables.
For Whom It’s Good
The iEXOS-100-2 is ideal for tech enthusiasts who appreciate innovative engineering and want to support a different approach to mount design. If you’re interested in the potential of multi-processor control systems and enjoy working with evolving software ecosystems, this mount offers a glimpse into where the technology might be heading. Beginners willing to invest time in learning the ExploreStars app will find a capable GoTo mount at a reasonable price point.
Astrophotographers who value the convenience of clutched axes for easy equipment positioning will appreciate this feature during setup and balancing. Those who prefer tablet or smartphone control over traditional hand controllers will like the cross-platform ExploreStars app compatibility. Visual observers seeking GoTo capability without spending a fortune will find the iEXOS-100-2 provides good value.
For Whom It’s Bad
If you prefer simple, straightforward software that just works, the ExploreStars app learning curve might frustrate you. Those who want a polished, bug-free experience should consider more established options from Sky-Watcher or Celestron with larger user communities and more mature software. Astrophotographers doing long-focal-length imaging with heavy equipment will find the included tripod inadequate and should budget for an upgrade.
Be prepared to purchase a polar scope separately if you need precise polar alignment for long-exposure imaging. If you’re sensitive about equipment weight, note that 8 C batteries add significant heft—consider using an external power supply instead. Some quality control issues have been reported, so purchase from a retailer with good return policies.
How to Choose the Right Equatorial Mount in 2026?
Selecting the best equatorial telescope mount for your astrophotography needs requires careful consideration of several factors. Payload capacity tops the list—always choose a mount rated for at least 50% more than your total equipment weight. This safety margin ensures stable tracking and extends your mount’s lifespan. Remember to include the weight of your telescope, camera, guide scope, finder, and all accessories in your calculations.
Tracking accuracy determines whether your stars remain round points of light during long exposures. For unguided imaging with wide-field setups, aim for mounts with periodic error below 10 arcseconds. If you plan to autoguide, almost any quality mount can produce excellent results, but better periodic error means fewer corrections and smoother tracking. Belt-driven mounts like the Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro typically show lower periodic error than traditional worm gear drives.
Consider the difference between star trackers and full equatorial mounts. Star trackers like the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer series excel at wide-field imaging with camera lenses up to 200mm. They’re lightweight, portable, and perfect for travel. Full German equatorial mounts provide greater payload capacity for telescopes and longer focal lengths, but they’re heavier and more complex to set up. Choose based on your primary imaging targets—Milky Way landscapes favor star trackers, while planetary and deep-sky imaging demands a full EQ mount.
Understanding Mount Technologies
Strain wave and harmonic drive mounts represent the latest advancement in equatorial mount technology. Unlike traditional worm gears that require periodic error compensation, strain wave drives use flexible elliptical components to achieve extremely smooth tracking with virtually zero periodic error. Mounts like the ZWO AM5 (not covered in this roundup but worth considering) offer these benefits in a compact package. However, strain wave mounts typically cost more and may have lower payload capacity than equivalent worm gear mounts.
Traditional worm gear mounts use a rotating worm screw against a worm wheel to drive each axis. This proven technology has powered equatorial mounts for decades and offers excellent payload capacity and reliability. The main drawback is periodic error—inconsistencies in the worm gear that cause slight tracking variations. Quality worm gear mounts like the Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro use belt drives to minimize these errors and achieve impressively smooth tracking.
Autoguiding compatibility is essential for serious deep-sky imaging. Look for mounts with ST-4 autoguider ports if you plan to use a separate guide camera and telescope to correct tracking errors in real time. Most modern mounts support autoguiding, but some star trackers and travel mounts lack this capability. If you’re imaging at focal lengths above 300mm, autoguiding becomes nearly mandatory for pinpoint stars.
Polar Alignment Methods
Accurate polar alignment is fundamental to successful astrophotography with any equatorial mount. The traditional method involves aligning with Polaris using a polar scope, which all full-size equatorial mounts include. Illuminated reticles make this process easier, but it still requires practice to master. For those in the northern hemisphere, smartphone apps like Polar Align can assist by showing you exactly where Polaris should appear in your polar scope reticle.
Electronic polar alignment systems like Celestron’s All-Star Polar Alignment provide an alternative that doesn’t require seeing Polaris. This method aligns on any bright star and calculates the necessary adjustments, making it possible to achieve accurate alignment even with obstructed northern horizons. Southern hemisphere observers particularly benefit from electronic alignment, as there’s no bright southern pole star equivalent to Polaris.
Drift alignment represents the most accurate method, requiring no special equipment other than your imaging camera. By observing star drift near the celestial equator and meridian, you can calculate and correct polar alignment errors to within a fraction of a degree. Software tools like SharpCap and PHD2 automate this process, making precision alignment achievable even for beginners. While drift alignment takes longer than other methods, it’s the gold standard for demanding long-focal-length imaging.
Portability and Setup Considerations
Your imaging style should dictate mount portability requirements. Permanent backyard observatories can accommodate heavy mounts like the EQ6-R Pro without concern for weight. However, if you frequently travel to dark sky sites, every pound matters. Consider not just the mount weight but also counterweights, tripod, and any additional accessories. Travel-friendly options like the Star Adventurer series weigh under 3 pounds while still providing capable tracking.
Setup time varies dramatically between mount types. Star trackers can be operational in 5-10 minutes with practice. Full-size German equatorial mounts typically require 15-30 minutes for complete setup including polar alignment and balancing. If you have limited time for imaging sessions or observe from locations with quick-changing weather, faster setup mounts might serve you better despite other limitations.
Think about your progression path in astrophotography. Beginners often start with wide-field camera imaging before progressing to telescopes and longer focal lengths. A star tracker might serve you well initially, but consider whether you’ll eventually want to image planets or deep-sky objects requiring a full equatorial mount. Sometimes it’s more cost-effective to buy a larger mount initially rather than upgrading later, though this means carrying more weight than necessary during your early learning phase.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best equatorial mount for astrophotography?
How much does a good astrophotography mount cost?
What is the payload capacity needed for astrophotography mounts?
Do I need an autoguider for astrophotography?
What is the difference between star tracker and equatorial mount?
Conclusion
Choosing from the best equatorial telescope mounts for astrophotography has to offer in 2026 ultimately comes down to matching your equipment, targets, and observing style with the right capabilities. For beginners exploring wide-field imaging, the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer series offers an accessible entry point with excellent tracking in a portable package. Intermediate astrophotographers stepping up to telescopes will find the Sky-Watcher HEQ5 or Celestron Advanced VX provide the perfect balance of capacity, accuracy, and value.
Advanced users with heavy equipment and serious deep-sky ambitions should invest in the Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro or similar heavy-duty mounts—their precision tracking and substantial payload capacity deliver professional results. Remember that your mount is the foundation of your entire astrophotography system. A quality mount will serve you for years as your skills and equipment evolve, making it worthy of careful consideration and investment.
Whatever your experience level or budget, there’s an equatorial mount on this list that will help you capture stunning images of the night sky. Take time to assess your needs, research thoroughly, and choose wisely. Your future self under the stars will thank you for investing in quality equatorial telescope mounts astrophotography equipment from the start.
